The Enron tapes

Published Friday, 4 June 2004 12:52AM CST by in Business

0

You think they would have learned after Nixon.

CBS News has obtained tapes of Enron energy traders conversing among themselves about how badly they were sticking it to consumers back in the heyday of California’s experiment with a deregulated energy industry. The tapes are from Enron’s West Coast trading desk and prove that Enron’s traders deliberately drove up prices by ordering the the temporary shutdown of power plants.

To date, former Enron chairman Ken Lay has been Mr. Untouchable, the only high-level Enron employee who hasn’t been indicted. That should change soon based on the CBS tapes:

“Government Affairs has to prove how valuable it is to Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling,” says one trader.

“Ok.”

“Do you know when you started over-scheduling load and making buckets of money on that?

Before the 2000 election, Enron employees pondered the possibilities of a Bush win.

“It’d be great. I’d love to see Ken Lay Secretary of Energy,” says one Enron worker.

That didn’t happen, but they were sure President Bush would fight any limits on sky-high energy prices.

“When this election comes Bush will f———g whack this s—t, man. He won’t play this price-cap b———t.”

Crude, but true.

“We will not take any action that makes California’s problems worse and that’s why I oppose price caps,” said Mr. Bush on May 29, 2001.

Only one question: how much longer before we institute the model uniform code for corporate responsibility?

The anti-war disconnect

Published Tuesday, 25 May 2004 8:53PM CST by in Politics

0

Last night Ralph Nader, addressing the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City, called for America to withdraw from Iraq—both corporate and military—by the end of the year, replacing U.S. forces with a United Nations peacekeeping force. Nader also called for the impeachment of President Bush: “To say Bush has exaggerated the threat of Saddam Hussein is pretty much commonly accepted. The fabrications, deceptions, and prevarications rise to high crimes and misdemeanors and warrant impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives.”

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry has never called for U.S. troop withdrawal, instead puppeting President Bush’s call for U.S. forces to remain in Iraq indefinitely, citing “strategic interests.” Kerry also mimics Bush’s policies of indefinitely detaining terrorism suspects without legal access and the USA PATRIOT ACT.

What I don’t understand is why the American anti-war contingent isn’t flocking to Nader’s campaign in droves.

Advocacy and regulation in the Bush administration

Published Tuesday, 25 May 2004 8:36PM CST by in Politics

0

Anne C. Mulkern reports in “When advocates become regulators” in the Denver Post that President Bush has appointed more than 100 officials in his administration who were once lobbyists, lawyers, or spokespeople for the industries they now oversee on behalf of the citizenry.

Although a White House spokesman said that administration officials “must abide by strict legal and ethical guidelines…” Mulkern points out that six administration officials have been subjects of ethics investigations or resigned after being charged with conflicts of interest and that at least 14 more are singled-out by public-interest groups.

Why I won’t accept a kidney transplant

Published Sunday, 23 May 2004 3:16PM CST by in ESRD

0

I’ve angered close friends and my sister by rejecting their offers of a kidney donation. When confronted about why, the best I’ve been able to manage is to mumble something incoherent about “ethics” and “not a cure anyway.” It’s been a very interesting self-exploratory journey, and it doesn’t mean that I won’t change my mind next year; hell, I’ve completely reversed my position on embryonic stem cell research after deconstructing the spin from both sides. Larry Rother’s “Tracking the Sale of a Kidney on a Path of Poverty and Hope” in this morning’s New York Times doesn’t offer much insight into my situation, but it does provide some solid numbers that help solidify my present feelings.

Brazilian organ brokers used to pay a decade’s wages—US$10,000—for a kidney, but now the market rate has dropped to about US$3,000, presumably because supply is starting to catch up with demand in a multi-million dollar black market. The Brazilian market is getting quite sophisticated, with Israeli organ traffickers orchestrating medical exams to eliminate unqualified donors and providing transportation to South Africa where the transplant actually takes place. Gone, apparently, are the mythical days of Western tourists waking up minus a kidney in ice-filled Bangkok bathtubs. Still, nobody bothers to tell the donors that what they’re doing is illegal.

The most disturbing revelation of Rother’s piece is that the profiled kidney recipient “described herself as deeply religious and concerned with the ethics of transplants.” That and the fact that a disturbing number of the Brazilian donors lost both their kidney and their money.

Six Apart and transparency

Published Thursday, 20 May 2004 9:27PM CST by in Business

0

Transparent business processes—what a concept. Today, Anil Dash reveals that he’s moving to San Francisco and was mostly responsible for the recent licensing dustup surrounding Six Apart’s roll-out of Movable Type 3.0.

To use the requisite automotive analogy, if Six Apart were a shiny new car, I feel like I was the person who put the first dent in it, and then a couple thousand people stood around pointing and saying “It’s totalled!”

Two things stand out about this incident. First, that Dash got the support he needed from his management and second, that the whole process was transparent, albeit after the fact. The only thing that could have made this better is if the transparency had come before, rather than after, the licensing announcement.

Good for Dash and good for Six Apart. They’re learning and there’s a lot in this for all of us to study.

Page 154 of 256 pages ‹ First  < 152 153 154 155 156 >  Last ›