Apple launches Ping social media network, new iPods, and AppleTV

Published on Wednesday, 01 September 2010 07:49PM CST by Michael Fraase in Technology

0
Apple launches Ping social media network, new iPods, and AppleTV

Today Apple streamed its media event, announcing new versions of its iOS for its mobile devices, evolutionary iPods, and a new version of iTunes that contains Ping, a “social network for music.” As Dan Gillmor writes in his Salon piece, anyone who believes that “probably expected Amazon to remain just an online bookstore.”

The difference that makes a difference with Ping, compared to all of the other social media networks, is nothing short of astounding: Apple already has the credit-card numbers of 160 million verified users. It’s easy to explain why the record companies haven’t done something like this (their brains were small and, like the dinosaurs, they died). But it’s incomprehensible why Amazon wasn’t the first-mover here. As Gillmor writes, “... Amazon, which has been leagues ahead of everyone else on so many things, and which has had all the pieces in place for years now to create a transformative social/community operation, never tried.”

Apple has never done network products or social media well, but Ping may be different. Early reports are that Ping has an API (or will have) but Apple requires approval of the integration code.

Steve Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, announced that iTunes 10 with Ping was available “now.” It’s not. And still no Beatles music in Apple’s iTunes Store.

Twitter Digg Reddit Technorati Google Bookmark Delicious StumbleUpon Print Friendly Email

Illegal immigrants and dialysis

Published on Wednesday, 01 September 2010 06:57PM CST by Michael Fraase in ESRD

0
Illegal immigrants and dialysis

Should illegal immigrants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receive the dialysis treatments they need to survive? Atlanta’s Grady Memorial Hospital has been struggling with that question for several years after the community’s safety-net hospital closed its dialysis clinic to show Atlanta’s philanthropists how fiscally responsible it is.

Without dialysis or a kidney transplant, end-stage dialysis patients die, sometimes within as little as two weeks.

While Grady receives direct appropriations from both Fulton and DeKalk Counties, it remains Atlanta’s hospital of last resort and has been losing money for years.

Kevin Sack and Catrin Einhorn, writing for the New York Times, report the closing of Grady’s dialysis clinic “displaced about 60 uninsured illegal immigrants who depended on free thrice-weekly treatments at the clinic to survive.” Grady offered to pay to ship the illegal immigrants to other states or their home countries and three months of dialysis. Thirteen took the offer; five died.

After a patient lawsuit and media attention, Grady contracted with Fresenius Medical Services for one year that expired this week.

Under a new agreement, Fresenius, DaVita, and Emory University would take a small number of illegal immigrants as charity and Grady would contract with Fresenius to treat the rest. As Sack and Einhorn write, “The patients in Atlanta have gambled that American generosity, even at a time of hostility toward illegal immigrants, would prove a surer bet than uncertain care in their home countries. Several said that the fates of those who returned home had reinforced their fears about leaving Atlanta.”

The agreement does nothing to resolve the issue of how to care for illegal immigrants, for whom health insurance is banned by the federal government under the new healthcare law. Similarly, the agreement (and the federal healthcare law) do nothing to resolve the issue of how to pay for hospital emergency room visits in which hospitals must treat patients under federal mandate.

As Jim Galloway writes in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, “If you’re a preacher stuck for a Sunday sermon topic, look no further. You can’t make up a moral dilemma like this one.”

Sack and Einhorn also report, “Fresenius and DaVita are the country’s largest commercial dialysis providers, with combined net income of more than US$1.3 billion last year.”

Twitter Digg Reddit Technorati Google Bookmark Delicious StumbleUpon Print Friendly Email

The blotter: Week ending 28 August 2010

Published on Sunday, 29 August 2010 08:21PM CST by Michael Fraase in Blotter

0
The blotter: Week ending 28 August 2010

Business

Businesses have been sending their products to “celebrities” forever. It’s one of the oldest public relations and marketing strategies and must work because they keep doing it. So, logic would dictate that the inverse—sending competitors’ products to those “celebrities” you don’t want tainting your brand should also work, right? Apparently so, because businesses are starting to do it. Calling it “unbranding,” according to Adam Fusfeld, writing for the Business Insider.

Amy Goodman, writing for truthdig, uses the salmonella-infected egg recall and associated problems in the US to revive the “growing movement to amend the U.S. Constitution, to strip corporations of the legal status of “personhood,” the concept that corporations have the same rights as regular people.” Other developed parts of the world don’t have chicken egg-related salmonella problems because they vaccinate their hens.

When you drive a car that’s nearly 20 years old, you keep at least a passing interest in the US automobile market. I like to keep a running list of two or three cars I’d consider in my head. Just in case. Until today the Volkswagen Jetta topped that list. Well, actually, the Cooper Mini topped my list, but my wife said absolutely not. But today I found out that the 2011 Volkswagen Jetta has been retooled for American audiences. Volkswagen has made the misstep of deciding to compete with the Japanese on—wait for it—price. Turns out, not many in the US are willing to pay extra for a entry-level European sedan. But torsion beam rear suspension and rear drum brakes? You’ve got to be joking.

Twitter Digg Reddit Technorati Google Bookmark Delicious StumbleUpon Print Friendly Email

New Orleans cops ordered to shoot looters after hurricane Katrina

Published on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 07:04PM CST by Michael Fraase in Law

0
New Orleans cops ordered to shoot looters after hurricane Katrina

In an article co-published with the New Orleans Times-Picayune, Sabrina Shankman and Tom Jennings of Frontline, Brendan McCarthy and Laura Maggi of the New Orleans Times-Picayune, and AC Thompson of ProPublica report that New Orleans police were told they could shoot looters after hurricane Katrina. The journalists source the story from present and former members of the New Orleans police department and report that “it’s not clear how broadly the order was communicated” and that some officers refused to carry it out.

A police lieutenant provided a partial videotape of a police captain relaying the order: “We have authority by martial law to shoot looters,” the journalists report being able to hear Captain James Scott tell officers on the videotape. The lieutenant who shot the video refused to provide the complete recording. The report notes Captain Harry Mendoza “told federal prosecutors last month that he was ordered by Warren Riley, then the department’s second-in-command, to ‘take the city back and shoot looters.’” A police lieutenant under Mendoza told the reporters he’d testify to hearing the same order. Riley denies issuing the order to shoot looters. Scott refused to comment but his attorney said “that a fuller version of the videotape places his remarks in a different context.” Three unnamed sources corroborate Mendoza’s account or Riley’s order; one named source “did not recall Riley explicitly saying that officers could shoot looters.”

Universal standards for the use of deadly force, up to this incident, allow police to shoot only to protect themselves or others from an imminent physical threat—“great bodily harm.” And, as the reporters note, martial law does not constitutionally exist in Louisiana. Nonetheless, then-Mayor Ray Nagin called for martial law in meetings with Riley and used the phrase on the radio. Nagin, like Scott, refused to comment.

The team reports that it remains unclear with whom the orders originated or “whether they were heard by any of the officers involved in shooting 11 civilians in the days after Katrina.”

What everyone agrees on is that Riley did order his captains to “take back the city.” Samuel Walker, professor emeritus at the University of Nebraska at Omaha and author of 13 books on police, civil liberties, and criminal justice told the reporters such a statement is “absolutely wrong, [a] complete invitation to disaster.”

Twitter Digg Reddit Technorati Google Bookmark Delicious StumbleUpon Print Friendly Email

The blotter: Week ending 22 August 2010

Published on Sunday, 22 August 2010 01:57PM CST by Michael Fraase in Blotter

0
The blotter: Week ending 22 August 2010

Business

Target—the corporation—recently gave US$150,000 to a political organization to buy ads supporting the far-right Minnesota Republican gubernatorial candidate, Tom Emmer. Emmer is anti-gay and anti-worker. This has backfired for the massive retailer who has made serious bank on its carefully cultivated urbane image. MoveOn.org, another political organization of a decidedly left persuasion has produced an interesting video, “Target Ain’t People,” that’s representative of the backfire. While this isn’t up to the calibre of the antics of the Ken’s Kesey and Babbs, it’s a step in the right direction. Watch the video and if you’re so inclined, sign MoveOn.org’s petition. Here’s what I wrote: “Dear Greg Steinhafel, chief executive, Target Brands, Inc. Thanks so much for reinvigorating the corporate personhood issue. You’re just swell. Keep up the great work.” Jackie Crosby, writing for the Star Tribune, reports that three asset management firms—Calvert, Trillium, and Walden—have asked for a full assessment of Target’s political contributions. Crosby fails to provide full context: Calvert, Trillium, and Walden are all socially responsible asset management concerns, as pointed out by David Brauer, writing for MinnPost.com.

Maybe, just maybe, the US citizenry is starting to realize the stock market for what it is: A crap-shoot with house odds more favorable (to the house) than any casino. Graham Bowley, writing for the New York Times, reports that have withdrawn US$33.12 billion from domestic stock market mutual funds since January. “At this stage in the economic cycle, US$10 to US$20 billion would normally be flowing into domestic equity funds,” Brian K. Reid, chief economist of the Investment Company Institute told Bowley.

Twitter Digg Reddit Technorati Google Bookmark Delicious StumbleUpon Print Friendly Email